When is a vaccine not a vaccine?
A vaccine is not a vaccine in the case of the BioNTech &Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, let me explain. Here are the definitions of Immunity and Vaccine from the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) in the US.
“Immunity is protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune from a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected”.
“A vaccine is a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease protecting the person from that disease”.
A traditional vaccine will introduce a small piece of the virus to stimulate an immune reaction as per definitions.
As a consequence, you could quite rightly make the following assumptions, and this is probably why you have made a decision to have the vaccination.
When you receive a vaccine, you are assuming it is going to stop you getting infected by the virus?
By taking the vaccine you are protecting other people, you are making sure you are not transmitting it to other people.
The public health definition would be, by taking a vaccine you are stopping yourself from getting the virus and also transmitting it to someone else, i.e., protecting someone else. Public health law is about the community.
Do you agree so far, it is clear, and I would suggest that most people know this? So, the question is, if this is what you are expecting when you are going to be holding out your arm in the coming months depending where you are in the queue, you need to know the following information, because both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not follow the traditional definitions of vaccines and therefore should not be called vaccines.
Once you have read the following information, you must then research it for yourself and then you are going to make a decision whether to have the vaccination or not, totally your decision. I have then done my bit by giving you information that you may not otherwise have found. Nobody can then say, “well nobody told me”. You must realise that whatever goes into your arm is totally irreversible that is why it is such an important decision you are making.
So, what are the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines if they are not vaccine, and more importantly why are they calling it a vaccine if it is not a vaccine?
You have all heard of Pfizer no doubt, Moderna is the new kid on the block and was started as a gene therapy company with its main aim of producing and improving cancer chemo- therapy treatments. For Moderna this is the first large scale vaccine they have ever made.
The Pfizer and Moderna are using mRNA and DNA gene technologies and you may know this because they are telling us this, it is also the reason that Moderna can get in on the act, gene therapy company remember.
So, what is the difference between traditional and mRNA technology, its massive?
The clinical trials primary end point of both ‘vaccines’
“Prevention of symptomatic COVID 19 disease”. Not a disease but a set of symptoms.
It was impractical to measure infection in the clinical trials. It was not measuring immunity or infection, therefore NO Protection from catching the Virus has been ascertained so far, and the Data does not show protection. Therefore, both vaccines do not comply with the CDC definitions of a vaccine or its immunity protection. They are synthetic gene therapies they are not vaccines as defined by the CDC definition. There is no protection against infection and no protection against transmission.
Here is what a recent Lancet article says - “No existing vaccines (ed: and that will include the AstraZeneca vaccine), have been shown to be effective against infection with any Beta corona virus. The family that includes Sars COV-2 which causes COVID-19”.
The CDC recommends that people not assume they are completely immune to infection after having been vaccinated.
PEOPLE ARE BEING TOLD THERE IS A PROTECTION THAT THE DATA ITSELF DOES NOT SHOW
I am saying this because everyone I ask is thinking traditional vaccines, they are not realising that a definition of a vaccine has just been changed.
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not designed to stimulate the immune system in the traditional way. They are not claiming immunity and having the vaccine does not stop the spreading of the virus. So, their vaccines will not stop you catching the virus, it will not stop you transmitting it. It might and this is what they are saying, it will reduce the symptoms once you have caught the virus and are therefore you are less likely to die from catching it.
So, don’t think you are going to be throwing away your masks anytime soon, or social distancing for that matter.
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are not vaccines, they are gene therapies that have been designed to stimulate the human cells by injecting synthetic non-human molecules of mRNA, packaged in a fat envelope into our cells which then interacts with our transfer RNA to make a protein to protect the body from a virus. These new proteins created are completely foreign to our cells. We have no idea what are the long-term effects on the body this will produce and any potential auto-immune disease in the future. The definition of a safe vaccine is that it should be tested long enough to properly track adverse events including those discovered once a vaccine has been approved. These vaccines are therefore experimental because we have no long-term data.
These are completely new types of vaccines, never used before and we have no idea if their long-term health implications. Experimental mRNA and DNA gene technologies should undergo years of testing before being used on the public. RNA vaccines will make permanent changes to your DNA because that is what they have been designed to do. We are opening a pandoras box of potentially life-threatening autoimmune diseases. And nobody has a clue whether this is will happen or not because we have not long-term data. We are human Guinea pigs.
Your annual COVID jab
The COIVID-19 has already mutated hundreds of times and you are hearing of the latest mutant, more transmissible variant all the time. All to scare you, by the way. As with the flu viruses every year, the mutations will go beyond a threshold where the existing vaccine is no longer effective, necessitating an upgrade. Therefore, requiring you to have your annual COVID jab, obvious really. I suspect we will go straight to COVID-21 and bypass 20.
You need to know people are being harmed, many people are having significant side effects already and some have died (doctor in Florida, two weeks later dead, death being investigated by CDC and Pfizer). Adverse reactions are coming in from around the world, a lot of people are being injured from these vaccines and the numbers people dying is also rising. If you read the information sheet for the vaccine it will list out the side effects, they have to do this and if you have any allergies you need to be asking lots of questions before you get vaccinated. Please research this for yourself.
The Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine is a viral vector vaccine, containing a weak or inactivated virus that cannot cause disease. This virus has genetic material from the Covid-19 virus inserted in it. Once the viral vector is inside human cells, the cells make a protein unique to the Covid-19 virus. This triggers the body to begin to build an immune response.
“Early indication that vaccine could reduce virus transmission from an observed reduction in asymptomatic infections.” Again, too early to prove. Everything is too early to prove, also how long any antibody protection may last, because these are all experimental vaccines the long-term data is not in yet, fact.
Three Covid-19 vaccines that only prevents illness, which is to say, symptoms, that might not prevent infection with the virus or the transmission of it to other people and worst case, a vaccinated person could still be an asymptomatic carrier! It’s your call.
For your information
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 was signed into law by US President Ronald Reagan as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986. NCVIA's purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims in order to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims. The U.S. government has, over the past three decades, paid more than $4 billion to people who claim to have been harmed by vaccines.
This is the main reason why we have to call them vaccines. Because if we called the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines anything else they would not come under the remit of the act and therefore the pharmaceutical companies would then be liable, and we cannot have that can we?
What about the UK
In the 1970s, the Pearson commission recommended that the Government should accept liability to pay full compensation for vaccine injury on the basis that it is the very occasional price that society pays for the benefit of defeating disease through national vaccination programmes. At that time, vaccines were not such a major part of the public health programme as they are today. During the intervening years, vaccines have greatly grown in importance and use.
Today, the compensation award in the UK is just £120,000. Yes £120,000: totally inadequate compensation for someone who could be seriously and profoundly disabled. This compensation comes from the government.
All vaccines have been released under emergency use authorisation, because they have not completed long term studies and the pharmaceutical companies that have produced the vaccines are NOT liable for any vaccine damage caused. And remember, ‘it’s all about the money’ the pharmaceutical companies will make billions from experimental vaccines that they are going to inject into you every single year.
And another thing
If none of the vaccines do prevent transmission, but only prevent disease, then the whole notion of “vaccine passports” makes no sense.
Now please research all the above for yourself and remember, it is your call.